Tenders Are Invited For Providing Investor Supervision Services Over The Investment Task Entitled: Construct ... in Poland

Work Detail

1) Investor Supervision Service Over The Investment Task, Including Design, Delivery And Assembly: 1) 6 Pellet Boilers, 16 Solar Collector Installations, 219 Photovoltaic Installations, 170 Energy Storage Units, 4 Heat Pumps For Domestic Hot Water (Dhw), 115 Heat Pumps For Central Heating (Central Heating) And Dhw  2 Photovoltaic Installations, 2 Energy Storages - Miejska Biblioteka Publiczna Im. Adam Próchnik - 1 Pc. Photovoltaic Installation - Local Government Kindergarten No. 5, - 1 Pc. Photovoltaic Installation - Local Government Kindergarten No. 7, - 1 Pc. Photovoltaic Installation - Local Government Kindergarten No. 8, - 1 Pc. Photovoltaic Installation - Local Government Kindergarten No. 24 With Integration Departments. Misia Uszatka.2) Reasons For The Lack Of Division Into Parts: The Subject Of The Order Is The Provision Of Investor Supervision Services In The Electrical, Sanitary And Construction Industries Over The Delivery And Installation Of Res Energy Generating Units. Separating Supervision Services Would Pose A Risk Of Organizational Problems Related To Responsibility For Individual Elements Of Services Performed By Different Contractors. With This Type Of Services, It Is Not Possible To Clearly Define The Rules Of Responsibility For The Correct Performance Of The Supervision Service. While It Is Physically Possible To Conduct Separate Industry Supervisions, Each Separate Entity Is Not Bound By The Decisions And Findings Of Other Inspectors. If The Services Are Provided By Various Entities Independent Of Each Other, Ensuring The Correct Investor Supervision Process Would Be Significantly Difficult. When Recruitment Is Carried Out By, For Example, Two Different Entities Independent Of Each Other, There Is No Possibility Of Real Coordination Of Work On The Part Of The Contractors. Therefore, Not Dividing The Contract Was Dictated By Technical And Organizational Reasons And The Nature Of The Subject Of The Contract. Any Division Of The Contract Into Parts Would Not Increase Competitiveness In The Sector Of Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises - The Scope Of The Contract Is Typical, Enabling Contractors From The Group Of Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises To Submit An Offer. The Ordering Party Did Not Divide The Contract Into Parts Due To The Fact That Such A Division Would Pose A Risk Of Excessive Technical Difficulties And Excessive Costs Of Contract Execution. The Need To Coordinate The Activities Of Different Contractors Implementing Individual Parts Of The Contract Could Seriously Jeopardize The Proper Performance Of The Contract.2. The Subject Of The Order Is Described In Detail In Swz Part Ii - Description Of The Subject Of The Order.3. The Ordering Party Does Not Reserve The Obligation For The Contractor To Personally Perform Key Tasks. 6. The Ordering Party Does Not Stipulate That Only Sheltered Workshops And Other Contractors Whose Activities, Or The Activities Of Their Organizationally Separated Units That Will Perform The C

Contact Information