| Work Detail |
(CP) - Management Board of construction investment projects (construction investment project management) No. 02 TP. Bac Giang (The tenderer) has just announced that Tan Thinh Construction Co., Ltd is the only contractor that meets the technical requirements. Package No. 04 Construction of works under Xuong Giang Road Bridge Construction Project - connecting Nguyen road Thi Minh Khai and Tran Quang Khai Street, TP. Bac Giang costs more than VND 100 billion. The two contractors participating in the Bidding Package for Changjiang Road Overpass (Bac Giang City) were rejected because there was no confirmation of disposal by the accepting party. Artwork: st The two contractors participating in the Bidding Package for Changjiang Road Overpass (Bac Giang City) were rejected because there was no confirmation of disposal by the accepting party. Artwork: st In this bidding package, the bid solicitor is accused of adding unnecessary requirements to the bidding dossier (Bidding Documents) in order to restrict competition. The above bidding package is widely bid in the country by mode of 1 stage 2 dossier bags; Bidding was completed on December 11, 2019 with 3 bidders submitting bids. Tan Thinh Construction Co., Ltd. has an address in the city. Bac Giang, Bac Giang province. According to research, within the past 4 years, Tan Thinh Construction Co., Ltd. was announced to win 60 bidding packages located in Bac Giang province. Notably, this contractor again accidentally at the opening ceremony of technical proposals (Technical Proposal) when not submitting 1 USB to save the entire contents of Technical Proposal and financial proposal (Financial Proposal - excel file). as required by the Bidding Documents (item Bidder 19.1). While the remaining 2 contractors have submitted the full Bid dossier according to this item. The record of opening Technical Proposal clearly shows this content. In the opinion of some contractors, the Bidding Documents very clearly requires the number of copies of Financial Proposal, Technical Proposal and submit a USB to save the entire contents of Technical Proposal and Financial Proposal (excel file) that Tan Thinh Construction Co., Ltd. does not perform. it may be eliminated immediately because the Bid dossier does not meet the requirements of the Bidding Documents. However, replying to the Bidding Newspaper reporter on this issue, the bid solicitors representative said that the contractor could not be eliminated because it did not submit 1 USB at the opening ceremony of Technical Proposal. The reason is, USB is only necessary in case of opening Financial Proposal, but at opening ceremony of Technical Proposal, it is not yet open. Meanwhile, according to the content of the notice of the Project Management Board of Construction Investment 02 cities. Bac Giang, 99 Construction One Member Limited Liability Company and Joint Venture Bridge Construction Joint Stock Company 75 - Transport Engineering Management and Construction Joint Stock Company 236 were disqualified because the Technical Proposals of these two contractors did not have the confirmation of dumping. the accepting party discharges waste materials during the construction process under the provisions of Chapter III - Section 3, Technical evaluation criteria of Bidding Documents. Previously, on 6/1/2020, in the document clarifying the Bid dossier to the Project Management Board of Construction Investment 02 cities. Bac Giang, Joint Venture of Bridge Construction Joint Stock Company 75 - Transport Engineering Management and Construction Joint Stock Company 236 said that according to the Bidding Documents in Circular No. 03/2015 / TT-BKHDT of the Ministry of Planning and Investment , section 6.3 (Environmental sanitation) only requires the contractor to take reasonable and feasible measures to ensure environmental sanitation in accordance with the proposal on construction organization measures. The contractor said that the Bidding Documents adding the content transporting discarded waste must clearly state the dumping location and the contractors commitment not to cause environmental pollution. At the same time, there must be a confirmation of approval for the dumping site of the accepting party (clearly stating the distance of transport from the construction site to the dumping dump site) ”is redundant and causes difficulties for bidders, only being beneficial. to the designated bidder. Because, in the process of designing and drawing construction cost estimates, the Investor and the locality have decided the disposal sites for the works. The bidding for this requirement is contrary to the Prime Ministers Directive 47 / CT-TTg and the Instruction 03 / CT-BKHDT of the Minister of Planning and Investment, causing unequal competition in the tenders, local and local. |
