| Work Detail |
(PCU) - Package No. 05, Experimental pile of the Experimental Project combining with the University of Electricity University in the process of evaluating bids (Bid dossier). In a document sent to the Bidding Newspaper recently, a contractor reflected the School is making it difficult for the Contractor by asking for too many clarification documents. How really this story is, how are the opinions of the parties concerned? Ask the contractor to provide too many original documents As reflected by the Contractor, to clarify Bid dossier, Electricity University - Investor / Bid solicitor as well as the bidding consultancy unit (Project Management Joint Stock Company and Investment Cost - AFO) makes it difficult for the Contractor by asking for too many original documents to be clarified, while the contractor asserts that he has the capacity. Specifically, the consultant requires this contractor to provide the original contract and liquidation minutes to compare with the reason for suspicion of Contract No. 08/2017 / HDTV on March 14, 2017 on the experiment load testing, ultrasonic testing piles at the project Housing staff, staff of the Government Councils have differences in implementation progress recorded in the contract and actual progress according to the liquidation minutes; contract liquidation value and actual value paid by the investor. This request of the consultant to compare the original documents is completely unfounded, the Contractor affirmed and proved that, in fact, this contractor performed the job even faster than the contract. . Regarding the value of the payment, the investor has not paid the entire value of the completion due to the terms of the contract. This is not the reason for the bid solicitor and the consultant unit to be suspicious. Besides, the Contractor also said that the consulting unit asked the Contractor to provide too many originals. Specifically, the original acceptance record of completing the Package of Experimental bored piles of experiment area B of the project of housing, office, service 136 Ho Tung Mau; the original (university diploma, certificate, ID card of the entire expert) declared in the contract submitted by the Contractor in the Bid dossier ... Requesting to provide too many original documents is making it difficult for us. , The Contractor reaffirmed and said that these requirements were not in line with the guiding spirit of the Prime Minister in Directive 47 / CT-TTg. Does the bid solicitor make it difficult for contractors? Talking to Bidding Newspaper, Mr. Le Thanh Hai, officer of the University of Electricity in charge of selecting contractors explained: “The requirements mentioned are only for the purpose of selecting contractors with real capacity. , ensuring the progress and quality of the Bidding Package according to the set plan ”. Mr. Hai said, before that, the University also organized a selection of contractors for a number of bidding packages, however in the process of evaluating bid dossiers, related parties have discovered some contractors providing dishonest information about energy. my force. On the other hand, this officer affirmed: The request of contractors to provide original documents to clarify bid dossier is in accordance with the provisions of the law on bidding. The process of selecting contractors is completely objective and transparent ”. Further proof, in the Document No. 209/2018 / CV-FAO to the Contractor at the beginning of December 2018 on the explanation of the petition letter, the Project Management Joint Stock Company and the investment cost also explained clarification. . Regarding the content of the Contractors petition on submission of original documents to demonstrate competence, the consultant said that the submission of the original for comparison is entirely consistent with the regulations. The reason is that, during the evaluation of bid dossier, the expert team doubts the authenticity of Contract No. 08/2017 / HDTV, the minutes of contract liquidation, due to the progress shown in the Contract and other liquidation minutes Far from each other, the paid value does not match the value of the payment request. For the requirement to provide other original documents, the consultant confirmed: This requirement does not violate Directive No. 47 / CT-TTg. Requesting an identity card or equivalent document is also consistent with the provisions of the Labor Code. On the other hand, this requirement is to ensure the feasibility of human resource mobilization, due to many cases of using diplomas and certificates without the consent of the supplier by ... ”. Commenting on this issue, a bidding expert acknowledged, in this case, it is necessary to consider whether the investor / consultant has requested the contractor to provide many original documents to ensure fairness among the contractor attended or not. “If the bid solicitor / consultant only requires the contractor to offer a lot of original documents, such as petitions, it is obviously difficult for the contractor. The requirement must have fairness among the participating contractors, ”said the expert. Also according to this expert, in the law on bidding, the contractor must prepare the originals for comparison when necessary to clarify the documents submitted in bid dossier, but not to take advantage of this regulation to causing difficulties for contractors. The evaluation of bid dossier must be based on selection of good contractors rather than unfairly disqualifying contractors. |
