| Work Detail |
Monday, 18/6/2018 14:00 Nha Trang Central University (the investor) has decided to cancel the dormitory package (KTX1 + KTX2) because of the loss of the baggage seal of the proposed financial proposal. All contractors before the opening of the financial proposal The contractor insists that the cancellation of the contract by the investor is groundless, not in the case of cancellation of contract as prescribed, thus damaging the legitimate interests of the contractor. Cancellation of bids because of loss of financial records The dormitory housing project (KTX1 + KTX2) belongs to the investment project of the Nha Trang Central Ethnic Minority Preparatory School using the state budget, transferring house and land and legal income of the house. the school, widely bid in the country, under mode 1 phase 2 pocket dossier; Bid for more than 1.4 billion. The bidding package was tendered on 27/06/2017. There are 6 bidders who submit bids, but only one bidder is evaluated to meet technical requirement of Thai Son Corporation - Ministry of Defense. On 26/10/2017, when opening the financial proposal file, the financial proposal file box (with the seal of the investor, the project management trust, the bidding consultant) is detected. sealed, while the sealing of the bidding units, sealed the storage room of the bidder remains the same. After consultation with concerned functional agencies, on June 13th, the Nha Trang Central Ethnic Minority Preparatory School has issued Decision No. 63 / QD-DBDHNT officially canceled the bidding package. . The reason is the loss of the sealed bags of financial proposals of all bidders before the opening of the financial proposal is not secure, not objective and not conform to the rules. the Law on Bidding and related documents. On June 14, 1818, Hoang Trong Ngo, Vice Rector in charge of Nha Trang Central Ethnicity College admitted that the loss of the bag It is the Universitys fault in the maintenance and sealing of materials during the procurement process. Although not in the case of contract cancellation, but to ensure the objectivity and transparency in the selection of contractors, the school decided to cancel the contract and organize bidding to re-bid in the fourth quarter / 2018. The investor accepts compensation for damages to the contractor Under the provisions of Article 17 of the Bidding Law, there are four cases of cancellation, including: all bids and proposals do not meet the requirements of the Bidding Documents, the required documents ( HSYC); To change the investment objectives and scope stated in the bidding documents, HSYC; Bidding documents, HSYCs do not comply with the law on bidding or other relevant law provisions, thus leading to the selection of contractors or investors not meeting the requirements for executing bidding packages or projects; There is evidence of the removal, receipt, bribery, bribery, fraud, abusive use of positions and powers to illegally intervene in bidding activities, thus distorting the results of selection of contractors, Investors. However, the story in the above package is not one of the four cases to cancel the contract as prescribed. Reflecting to the Bidding Newspaper, a contractor said that after the Contractor and the Investor have written documents asking for the opinions of all relevant agencies, including the verification of the incident by the Police In Khanh Hoa province, there is no unit claiming that this case must be canceled. The loss of this seal is attributable to the negligence of the archivist, without distorting the results of contractor selection. Despite the loss of the sealed envelope of the proposed financial proposal, the individual seal of each contractor remains intact. The fact that the investor decides to cancel the contract and re-organizes the bidding directly affects the interests of the contractor. Talking with Bidding Newspaper, Mr. Hoang Trong Ngo said that this is an incident not wanted but happened. The school also determines that this is a fault of its own, so will compensate the costs and damages to the contractor on the principle of agreement and agreement between the two parties. In case of inconsistency, the case will be brought to the court to determine the cost of compensation to the contractor. |
