|
Software Programming And Consultancy Services – It Consulting And Advisory Services In The Implementation Of The Openstack Platform. 1. The Subject Of The Order Are It Consulting And Advisory Services In The Field Of Knowledge Transfer, Design, Installation, Configuration, Parameterization, Launch, Monitoring, Security, Maintenance And Development Of A Private Cloud Based On The Ordering Partys Openstack Platform. 2. The Ordering Party Expects Services To Be Provided In The Amount Of Up To 100 Hours Per Month. The Guaranteed Minimum Is 10 Hours Per Month And Will Be Treated As The Equivalent Of A Fixed Monthly Subscription Fee. The Total Maximum Number Of Hours Per Year Is 1,200. 3. A Detailed Description Of The Subject Of The Order Is Included In Annex No. 1 To The Swz - Sopz, Hereinafter Referred To As Sopz And In The Contract Template, The Template Of Which Is Annex No. 7 To The Swz (Hereinafter: Contract Template Or Agreement). ). 4. In Cases Where The Detailed Description Of The Subject Of The Order Indicates Trademarks, Patents, Origin, Source Or A Specific Process That Characterizes Products Or Services Provided By A Specific Contractor, Which Would Lead To The Privilege Or Elimination Of Certain Contractors Or Products, This Means That The Ordering Party Cannot Describe The Subject Of The Contract Using Sufficiently Precise Terms And This Is Justified By The Specificity Of The Subject Of The Contract. In Such Situations, Any Reference To Trademarks, Patents, Origin, Source Or Specific Process Should Be Read With The Words Or Equivalent. 5. If The Description Of The Subject Of The Contract Includes References To Standards, Technical Assessments, Technical Specifications And Reference Systems Referred To In Art. 101 Section 1 Point 2 And Section 3 Of The Public Procurement Law, The Ordering Party, In Accordance With Art. 101 Section 4 Of The Public Procurement Law Allows The Use Of Equivalent Solutions. Each Time A Standard, Technical Assessment, Technical Specification Or Technical Reference System Is Mentioned In This Tor, It Should Be Assumed That The Words Or Equivalent Have Been Used In Relation To Them. 6. The Contractor Who Refers To Equivalent Solutions Described By The Ordering Party Is Obliged To Prove In The Offer, In Particular By Means Of Evidence Referred To In Art. 104-107 Of The Public Procurement Law, That The Solutions Proposed By Him Equally Meet The Requirements Specified In The Description Of The Subject Of The Contract. Evidence, In Particular The Means Of Evidence Referred To In Art. 104-107 Of The Public Procurement Law, Confirming That The Solutions Proposed By The Contractor Meet The Requirements Specified In The Description Of The Subject Of The Order To An Equivalent Extent And Do Not Need To Be Supplemented. 7. The Ordering Party Applies To Art. 95 Section 1 Of The Public Procurement Law Requires That The Contractor Or His Subcontractor, Throughout The Entire Period Of Contract Implementation, Employ On The Basis Of An Employment Relationship Within The Meaning Of The Provisions Of The Act Of June 26, 1974, Labor Code (Journal Of Laws Of 2024, Item 878, As Amended). Y, Performing The Following Activities: Administrative Handling Of Notifications (An Office Employee Responsible For Receiving Notifications And Handling Them On The Contractors Side). 8. Way
|
